W. J. T. Mitchell’s “Picture Theory”: A Toolkit for Image-Text Criticism
This is not a style history of a single medium; it is a problem-oriented image-text criticism: treating pictures as social objects that *do* things, and examining their operations in materials, contexts, and discourse.
University of Chicago critic W. J. T. Mitchell published Picture Theory in 1994, compiling his key essays from the 80s and 90s. The book attempts to build a cross-disciplinary analytical language for “how pictures mean and how they interact with texts.” It is widely regarded as a key milestone in the maturation of Visual Culture studies, creating a bridge between art history, media studies, and literary theory.
Core Concepts: The Pictorial Turn and Image-Text Relations
Mitchell’s argument unfolds along four primary paths:
1. “The Pictorial Turn”: The Shift in Knowledge from Language to Image
Mitchell argues that humanities in the late 20th century moved from a “linguistic turn” to a “pictorial turn,” where theory and practice began to treat the image as a core problem, not just an illustration. Significance: Research no longer treats images as subordinate to text, but as independent mechanisms for producing knowledge.
2. The Three Relations of Image/Text: image/text, image-text, imagetext
He famously differentiates between the antagonistic “image/text” (tension between the two), the hyphenated “image-text” (complementation), and the composite “imagetext” (an inseparable hybrid). This trio provides a syntax for analyzing layouts, posters, ads, and digital interfaces, helping us describe how pictures and words reinforce or pull against each other.
3. The picture / image Distinction: Material Carrier vs. Virtual Form
A picture is a concrete, material object (a canvas, a photograph, a screen), while an image is the virtual, reproducible form that can flow across different carriers. Conclusion: To read an image, one must address both its “materiality” (size, medium, display conditions) and its “ideality” (its capacity to be re-used and re-contextualized). This is critical for curation and digital reproduction.
4. The “Metapicture”: Pictures about Pictures
Images that are self-referential, that discuss the rules of seeing and representation (e.g., pictures-within-pictures, mirrors, diagrams), are treated by Mitchell as sites of theory-generation. Significance: Theory is not just applied to images; it is performed and tested within them. The picture is thus both object and method.
Value and Impact: A Common Language and a Theoretical Seed
The enduring value of Picture Theory can be understood on two levels:
- Value as Method and Tool: The book provides a reusable, cross-disciplinary vocabulary: (a) “The Pictorial Turn” to situate the research problem; (b) The “image/text” trio to describe interaction; (c) The “picture/image” split to handle materiality and circulation; (d) The “metapicture” to ground theory in the work itself. These tools allow critics and curators to speak about images with clarity.
- Long-Term Impact: This book established a common language for visual culture studies. It complements the work of Sontag and Barthes (who emphasized ethics and affect, while Mitchell strengthens grammar and relations) and planted the theoretical seeds for his later, famous question in *What Do Pictures Want?* (2005)—the question of image agency and desire.
Picture Theory reminds us that to read an image, we must ask not only “what it looks like,” but also how it allies itself with text, medium, and context to change the way we understand.
コメント