Douglas Crimp’s “On the Museum’s Ruins”: Institutional Critique and the Postmodern Image
A collection of essays on institutional critique and postmodern theory: reading the “interlocking system” of exhibitions, collections, and criticism to understand how art’s meaning is produced.
American critic and curator Douglas Crimp published On the Museum’s Ruins in 1993, collecting his seminal essays from the 1970s to 90s. The book combines a Foucauldian analysis of apparatuses with a Benjaminian problematic of reproduction to discuss the museum as an institution that produces art history and visibility. It clarifies how the “age of photography” fundamentally rewrote the logic of originality, authorship, and display.
Core Concepts: The Ruins, The “Pictures” Generation, and Curatorial Grammar
Crimp’s argument unfolds along four primary paths:
1. “On the Museum’s Ruins”: The Myth of Modernist Display Deconstructed
Crimp argues that the “white cube” and the permanent collection are not neutral containers, but machines for constructing history. Through a linear arrangement of authors, styles, and media, they produce the myth of “originality” and “progress.” The mass reproduction and circulation of images, along with postmodern strategies of juxtaposition, reveal the cracks in this myth—the museum itself becomes a “ruin” of an ideal order, its authority exposed as a historical construct.
2. The “Pictures” Generation: Appropriation and the Postmodern Condition
The practices of artists like Sherrie Levine, Cindy Sherman, and Robert Longo no longer pursued the singular original. Instead, they used “re-photography,” appropriation, and re-enactment to expose the second-hand nature of images. Crimp famously labeled this “Pictures,” emphasizing that we are dealing with representations of representations, a citation network of images. Significance: The centrality of originality and authorship was loosened, replaced by a logic of circulation, editing, and re-contextualization.
3. Photography as the Museum’s “Outsider-Core”
Photography was both an “outsider” (failing the aesthetic/market logic of the unique original) and the “core” condition for rewriting the museum’s narrative. It introduced reproduction, series, the archive, and evidence into the grammar of the exhibition, forcing the museum to shift from “aura-worship” to methods of arrangement, juxtaposition, and archival display. Conclusion: Photography was not a marginal medium but the lever that changed the institution’s grammar.
4. Institutional Critique and Curatorial Grammar: Exhibition as Argument
Crimp argues that the exhibition, the catalog, and the review form an “argumentative chain.” Titles, wall texts, sequencing, and citations collectively produce meaning. Postmodern practice, through juxtaposition and citation, turns the display into a verifiable narrative rather than a naturalized presentation. Key point: Curation is not hanging; it is the arrangement of a thesis.
Value and Impact: A Toolkit for Institutional Reading
The enduring value of On the Museum’s Ruins can be understood on two levels:
- Value as Method and Tool: The book provides a toolkit: (a) Institutional reading: seeing the museum as an apparatus for producing knowledge; (b) The image-circulation model: using appropriation to explain postmodern art; (c) A synthetic grammar of curating-text-image; (d) The demythologizing of originality.
- Long-Term Impact: This book secured the “Pictures Generation” within art history and institutional critique. It forms a complementary tension with Krauss’s anti-originality arguments (proving the myth’s collapse from the institutional side), connects to the Sekula/Tagg “archive-governance” line (seeing display as a power procedure), and provides resources for Rosler and Azoulay in turning exhibitions into public arguments.
On the Museum’s Ruins teaches us: when critiquing an exhibition, don’t just look at the art; look at how the display speaks—what textual and imagistic order does it use to produce its version of history and authority.
コメント