John Tagg’s “The Burden of Representation”: An Archaeology of Evidence and Governance
This is not a “history of masterpieces,” but an institutional history and an archaeology of the archive: interrogating how photography was absorbed into the state apparatus and how it acquired authority within documentary systems.
In the 1980s, British scholar John Tagg published a series of seminal essays on photography, the state, and archival systems, which were collected in 1988 as The Burden of Representation. Using a Foucauldian framework of power/knowledge and archival research methods, the book re-evaluates “documentary” and “evidence” from the 19th and 20th centuries. It examines how photographs were produced and used within institutions like the police, poverty administration, education, and medicine to shape governable subjects.
Core Concepts: The Power of Evidence, Governance, and the Archive
Tagg’s argument unfolds along four primary paths:
1. “Evidence” is Produced: A Photo’s Authority Comes from the Institution
Tagg argues that a photograph becomes “evidence” not because of its inherent realism, but because it is inserted into the documentary procedures of the police, courts, schools, and welfare agencies: it is coded, captioned, filed, and cross-referenced. Conclusion: Evidentiary power is a product of archival procedure, not an innate property of the image itself.
2. Documentary Photography as an Arm of “Governmentality,” Not Neutral Record
From the poorhouse to prison portraiture, documentary images participated in the project of making the population “visible, classifiable, and comparable.” It fixed the regulated subject into descriptive categories (the poor, the sick, the criminal), becoming a tool of discipline and normalization. Key point: The “compassion” of documentary often coexisted with surveillance.
3. The Production of the Subject: From the Family Album to the Police File
The same technology produces vastly different “selves” in different contexts. The “self-narrative” in a family album and the “suspect individual” in a police file are both co-produced by an image-text-coding system. Tagg emphasizes that photos do not just represent subjects; they construct and fix their social identity and position.
4. A Methodology for History: From “Works” to “Documents” and “Practices”
Tagg shifts the research focus from masterworks and authors to forms, ledgers, archival classifications, and administrative procedures. Through case histories (of British and American welfare and police systems), he demonstrates a historical method of “small technologies, large effects,” offering a reusable research path: document analysis + institutional history + discourse analysis.
Value and Impact: As an Institutional Analysis Toolkit
The enduring value of Tagg’s work can be understood on two levels:
- Value as Method and Tool: The book precisely reorients the inquiry of photography studies: (a) An institutional perspective: looking first at how the image is absorbed into an archive and procedure; (b) A “governmentality” model: explaining the social effects of documentary through classification, surveillance, and statistics; (c) Subjectification analysis: understanding how photos position people as manageable objects.
- Long-Term Impact: This book runs parallel to Allan Sekula’s “politics of the archive/labor,” forming a classic coordinate on the “evidence-surveillance-governance” axis. It deeply influenced archival studies, surveillance studies, and the history of policing. It remains a crucial tool for understanding today’s facial recognition, ID photos, and database mechanisms.
The Burden of Representation teaches us: to judge an “evidence” photo, don’t just look at the picture—first, find the archival rules and the governmental field that grant it authority.
コメント